Sunday, 12 August 2012

Much ado about Lagos Road Traffic Law

Violating the traffic law
The signing of new Lagos Road Traffic Law, by Governor Babatude Fashola, last week, has elicited a cacophony from residents and stakeholders.

Lagos has many peculiarities, when compared to other states in the country. With a population of over 18 million people, the city’s vehicular traffic is chaotic. Perhaps, to bring some form of order, the state government on August 2, 2012, introduced the Lagos Road Traffic Law.
But this has generated mixed reactions from the residents and stakeholders. While some commended the government, many others have picked holes in the law. However, government officials have risen in defence of the new law, arguing that it would restore sanity, safety and security on Lagos roads.
The law is to correct such anomalies as disobeying road signs, using cell phone, smoking or eating while driving, driving against the traffic, driving without valid driving licence, refusal to obey traffic lights among other numerous traffic infractions.
Besides, the law barred the National Union of Road Transport Workers from operating on its roads and motor parks. Rather, it ordered them to start operating from offices like other unions in the state.
Again, commercial vehicles owners are now to re-register them, so as to get Hackney permit numbers, which will be displayed both inside and outside their vehicles. Also, no unpainted vehicle will be used as commercial buses among other regime of regulations.
Also, Okada operators are not ride without helmets, while carrying more than one passenger, carrying pregnant women and school children have been outlawed just as they are now to operate between the hours of 6:00am to 8:00pm. These are also among other regime of regulations well known to the operators.
Reacting to this development, a lawyer and journalist, Mr. Valentino Buoro said the law complemented existing traffic law but pointed out that there some grey areas in it needed more explanations.
These areas include using of cell phone while driving and on eating and drinking while driving. He said clarification on whether drivers who have hands free gadgets are exempted, was needed because the gadget gives the motorist an edge over someone making or receiving calls directly from their phones. However, the law allows the use of hands free gadgets.
Buoro said that eating while driving must also be clarified. Would someone eating gala or drinking bottled water be arrested? This issue is critical because many modern cars come with holes, beside the driver, where one can put bottled water or a cup of tea. Abroad, a motorist could drive into a fuel station and buy a cup of tea which he/she could sip inside the car.”
It is against these backgrounds that he called for a massive enlightenment programme by the state government so that all the grey areas would be fully explained to the residents, motorists and other stakeholders, before the enforcement begins. According to him this is only way to ensure that those to enforce the law will not abuse it.
An educationist, Miss Olasumbo Brown, shares Buoro’s view. She notes that many motorists in the city leave home very early and might not have taken their breakfast.
And given the unpredictable nature of traffic, it becomes a Herculean task when motorists are trapped in a gridlock for three or four hours. She stressed, “At least no one would eat amala or tuwo behind the wheels, but can’t someone eat a meat pie, gala or take water when one is extremely hungry in a gridlock? What if I want to take my medication? Does the law permit me to drink water?”
She equally called for massive enlightenment by relevant government agencies.
On her own part, Mrs. Feyikemi Olayinka, a television presenter, has her fears over the implementation of the law. According to her, the law is good on paper. She was satisfied with the punitive measures against dangerous habit of some motorists who drive against the traffic, popularly known as ‘one-way.’
Olayinka narrated how a victim of such violation of traffic law ruined a man’s life forever, which forced the wife to abandon him.
She stated: “We have a case of someone who was knocked down by a driver who was driving against the traffic, and he damaged his spinal cord in the process. The man is now confined to wheel chair. Such a callous driver must not only be made to go through a psychiatric test, he must be prosecuted and if possible sent to jail for causing bodily harm to a fellow road user.”
Though a Mr. Okey Nwachukwu, a marketing communication expert, notes that the law is for the good of the people in the state, he however, expressed concerns about possible abuse by the law enforcement agents. Therefore, he called for a counter-measure from government to curtail excesses of any law enforcement agents who might want to exploit motorists.
He argues, “It is one thing to make a law and it is another thing to enforce it. Before this new law, one could notice that some of the traffic law enforcement agents when an okada rider commits any offence or caught without wearing a helmet, they will tell him the actual fine but they will settle for a N2,000 or N3,000 bribe.
“This new law which has prison terms attached to some of the traffic offences might be exploited by these unscrupulous elements to even demand for higher amount of money.
In a text message, another resident, Mr. Ade Serrano, considers some aspects of the law as too harsh, especially three years imprisonment for smoking while driving.
Since all motorists do not live in Lagos, he called on relevant agency, to clearly mark all one-way roads and install functional Close Circuit Televisions to avoid people being wrongly accused.
Reacting to the mixed reactions which had greeted the new law, the state’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Ade Ipaye, says it will be wrong to say the law is purely punitive.
In an electronic message sent to our correspondent, he argues: “Actually, it is very reasonably liberal if you really study the provisions. Yes, there are fines for several traffic offences as is the case all over the world.
“There are also terms of imprisonment. But one thing most people may not know is that whenever a term of imprisonment is stated in legislation, it is presumed to be the maximum possible.”
He however added that the presiding Judge or Magistrate has a discretion and can decide to impose a lesser term of imprisonment, depending on the actual effect of the offence committed on other members of the public, whether the offender had been tried and convicted before, etc.
Ipaye further stresses that by driving against traffic, such motorist might cause death of another road user.
According to him, such motorist might also cause damage to other vehicles or simply cause aggravation and stress for other road users. These will inform the penalty to be imposed.
He states, “Causing death by dangerous driving can fetch the offender up to seven year imprisonment, while merely driving against traffic without causing any damage might probably be considered for a lighter penalty.
“What is even more beautiful about this law is section 36(3) which allows the judicial officer to choose not to send the convict to jail at all, whatever the offence.
“It provides that in addition to or in lieu of the prescribed sentence, the court may direct the suspension or revocation of the driver’s licence and order the convict to render community service, enrol for a course at the Driver’s Institute or do both.”
Ipaye’s counterpart in the Ministry of Transportation, Mr. Kayode Opeifa, who had been holding consultations with stakeholders in the transport sector, including okada operators, since the law came into force, says all stakeholders have all agreed to obey the law and cooperate with the government to ensure that it works.
He explained, “I told the leaders of the National Union of Road Transport Workers and Road Transport Employers Association of Nigeria that we did not ban them. But we want them to start operating from an office like other unions.
“They must leave the motor parks and the roads, because the roads are for everybody. They all pledged their support for the law.”
Opeifa says contrary to news reports, drivers and conductors of commercial buses are not to wear uniform; rather they are required to wear identification tags for easy identification.
He, however, adds that there is nothing wrong if they adopt uniform as their union official in the motor parks hitherto, wore uniform.
“Wearing of uniform is optional, but I don’t see anything wrong with it. Drivers and conductors of LAGBUS wear uniform, drivers in the bank wear uniform, and attendants at filling stations wear uniform. So, there is nothing wrong with it,” he said.
However, the enforcement of the law is yet to start, some drivers are still flouting the one-way traffic regulation. Some were seen throughout last week around Ile Zik area, along Lagos-Abeokuta Expressway, driving against traffic to link their residences around Mangoro and Cement Bus stop.
Again, for many okada riders, it is still business as usual. Some of them are still plying major highways, carrying more than one passenger, non-wearing of crash helmets, and not observing the 8:00pm closing time among others.
As one resident reasoned, prisons in Lagos might play host to many recalcitrant users who might want to dare the law.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...